Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 4, 1985No. 5-84-0359PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Earns

We granted defendant’s petition for leave to appeal under Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(1)(ii) (87 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(1)(ii)) from an order of the circuit court of St. Clair County denying its motion to decline jurisdiction under the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

On January 17, 1983, plaintiff brought this action for damages against the defendant railroad because of injuries received while working as a conductor on a train near Nashville, Tennessee, on October 15, 1982, when the caboose in which plaintiff was riding was “suddenly, unusually and violently jolted,” causing plaintiff to be thrown…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Wieser v. Missouri Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People Ex Rel. Compagnie Nationale Air France v. GilibertoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Moore v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Espinosa v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laird v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Barnes v. Southern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Walker v. Iowa Marine Repair Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Leet v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Mayhew v. Seaboard System RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API