Legal Opinion

Wieser v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1983No. 57325PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ryan

This case arises out of an action filed under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C. sec. 51 et seq. (1976)). The sole issue raised for our consideration is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied defendant’s motion to decline jurisdiction based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

Melva I. Wieser, as administratrix of the estate of Thomas R. Wieser, filed a complaint in the circuit court of St. Clair County, Illinois, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Melva Wieser was the wife of Thomas R. Wieser, who was employed by the defendant, Missouri…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Torres v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Jones v. Searle LaboratoriesIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Dawdy, Jr. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bell v. Louisville & NashVille RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API