Espinosa v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood
This is an action for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (1976)) in which the sole issue before us is whether the trial judge’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds constituted an abuse of discretion.
Plaintiff, Jose A. Espinosa, was employed by defendant, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, as a section foreman in its Melvindale, Michigan, yards. Melvindale is a Detroit suburb located some 530 miles from Edwardsville, the county seat of Madison County, Illinois. While so employed plaintiff was injured when his foot…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- People Ex Rel. Compagnie Nationale Air France v. GilibertoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Whitney v. MaddenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Torres v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Dawdy, Jr. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Wieser v. Missouri Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.