Legal Opinion

Leet v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1985No. 5-84-0393PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Earns

We granted defendant’s petition for leave to appeal, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(l)(ii) (87 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(l)(ii)), from the order of the circuit court of St. Clair County denying its motion to decline jurisdiction because St. Clair County was not a convenient forum in which to litigate the instant case.

On October 25, 1982, plaintiff brought this action for damages against the defendant railroad under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C. sec. 51 et seq. (1976)) because of injuries he received while working as a switchman near Louisville, Kentucky, on March 31,1980.

Defen…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trophytime, Inc. v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. In Re Adoption of AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Greco v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Herbert v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kemner v. Monsanto Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McClain v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Barnes v. Southern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ellis v. AAR Parts Trading, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Buckland v. LazarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API