Legal Opinion

Moore v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1983No. 57853, 57992PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

On the court’s own motion these two cases were consolidated for opinion after oral argument. They present a single issue for review: Did the trial court abuse its discretion when it denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens?

In each case, the defendants’ motions to dismiss the action on the grounds of forum non conveniens were denied by the trial court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(1)(ii) (87 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(l)(ii)), each defendant sought review of the trial court’s ruling in the appellate court. In exercising its discretion under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Wieser v. Missouri Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jones v. Searle LaboratoriesIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People Ex Rel. Compagnie Nationale Air France v. GilibertoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Dawdy, Jr. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Peile v. Skelgas, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brummett v. Wepfer Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API