Legal Opinion

Quaker Hill Place v. Saville

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 10, 1987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice * .

This appeal is from a final order of the State Human Relations Commission (the “Commission”) finding the appellant, Quaker Hill Place, to have unlawfully discriminated against appellee, Raymond Saville, Jr., in violation of 6 Del.C. § 4603(f). 1 Allegedly, Quaker Hill refused to rent an apartment to Saville because he suffered from a mental handicap. Quaker Hill maintains that Saville was denied an apartment based on criminal or antisocial behavior reasonably constituting a threat to the safety of the premises or the safety of other tenants, their property or guests.

This is…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morris Memorial Convalescent Nursing Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Future Ford Sales, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Boggerty v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. Saville v. Quaker Hill PlaceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. Chilson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API