Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Choate

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1985No. 83-727PublishedCited by 1,262 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

In 1980, Tennessee proposed reducing the number of annual days of inpatient hospital care covered by its state Medicaid program. The question presented is whether the effect upon the handicapped that this reduction will have is cognizable under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or its implementing regulations. We hold that it is not.

I

Faced in 1980-1981 with projected state Medicaid 1 costs of $42 million more than the State’s Medicaid budget of $388 million, the directors of the Tennessee Medicaid program decided to institute a variety of cost-saving measures. Among these changes was a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,262 opinions

  1. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

1,257 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API