Legal Opinion
Boggerty v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided February 17, 2011No. 489, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice:
This case arises out of a claimed violation of the Delaware Equal Accommodations Law (“DEAL”), 6 Del. C. § 4500 et seq., which prohibits denying access to public accommodations on the basis of race or color. The appellants, Andre Boggerty et. al. 1 (collectively, “Appellants”), claim that the Appellees, David Stewart (“Stewart”) and his employer, Carmike Cinemas, Inc. d/b/a Carmike 14 (“Carmike Cinemas”), violated the DEAL. The Appellants’ specific claim is that Stewart “insulted, humiliated, and demeaned” them by making a public announcement asking a movie theater audience to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Ted JOSEY, Appellant, v. JOHN R. HOLLINGSWORTH CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy & Landon, P.A. v. PernicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Ovens v. DanbergSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Barrett Business Service, Inc. v. EdgeSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Cosby v. Correct Care Solutions, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- Khan, PH.D. v. Delaware State UniversitySuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.