In Re Mutual Funds Investment Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
This document relates to: Strong sub-track
1Opinion of the Court
ERISA OPINION
BLAKE, District Judge.
Included in this MDL proceeding involving alleged late trading and market timing in the mutual funds industry are suits against various defendants in eight fund families brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). 1 Generally, the plaintiffs claim that the value of their retirement accounts was adversely affected by the timing activities permitted in certain mutual funds and that the defendant Plan fiduciaries knew or should have known that the relevant funds were not a prudent investment. 2 The defendants have filed omnibus and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Abraha v. Colonial Parking, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Havard v. Perdue Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- In Re Ford Motor Co. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- In Re Mutual Funds Inv. LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.