Legal Opinion

Havard v. Perdue Farms, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 12, 2005No. CIV. AMD 05-614PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, James Havard, instituted this one-count personal injury action against defendant Perdue Farms, Inc., seeking damages for an incident which occurred at a Perdue facility in Virginia. Jurisdiction is premised on diversity of citizenship. Discovery has concluded and now pending is defendant’s alternative dispositive motion, which seeks dismissal with prejudice. No hearing is needed. The motion shall be granted for the reasons stated within.

I

The material facts, in the light most favorable to plaintiff, may be summarized as follows. At all…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chubb & Son v. C & C Complete Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  3. Demetres v. East West Construction, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  4. Streeter v. SSOE SYSTEMSDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  5. Coastal Laboratories, Inc. v. JollyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API