Daniel Orifice Fitting Co. v. Whalen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment which in effect enjoined the defendants from using or disclosing to others certain drawings and patterns used or useful in the manufacture of a specialized valve and from manufacturing or selling items depicted therein, and requiring the defendants to deliver the drawings and patterns to plaintiff and to assist plaintiff in obtaining patents on any patentable invention depicted therein.
The complaint in this case set forth several causes of action, however we are concerned with only the third count which set forth in effect that the plaintiff was a corporation…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Science Accessories Corp. v. Summagraphics Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- GAB Business Services, Inc. v. Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. StranskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.