Danisan v. Cardinal Grocery Stores, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This record presents an appeal from judgments based on orders of nonsuit for damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when she slipped and fell while shopping in the Plumas Food Market in Marysville. The motion for nonsuit was denied as to the defendant Manuel Rose, and thereafter the action was dismissed without prejudice as to him.
The building in which the accident occurred was leased to the three defendants—Cardinal Grocery Stores, Inc., a corporation, referred to herein as “Cardinal”; Mario Del Pero, Hugo Del Pero and Gus Mondon, doing business as Del Pero-Mondon Meats, hereinafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hale v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Florez v. Groom Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Merritt v. NickelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Henderson v. McGillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Danisan v. Cardinal Grocery Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Florez v. Groom Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.