Legal Opinion

Danisan v. Cardinal Grocery Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1957No. Civ. 9120Published

1Opinion of the Court

155 Cal.App.2d 833 (1957)

VINETTA DANISAN, Appellant,

v.

CARDINAL GROCERY STORES, INC. (a Corporation), et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 9120.

California Court of Appeals. Third Dist.

Dec. 9, 1957.

C. Ray Robinson and Ronald G. Cameron for Appellant.

Rich, Fuidge & Dawson, Charles C. Dawson, Jr., and Peters & Peters for Respondents.

PEEK, J.

This record presents an appeal from judgments based on orders of nonsuit for damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when she slipped and fell while shopping in the Plumas Food Market in Marysville. The motion for nonsuit was denied as to the defendant Manuel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Hale v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API