Legal Opinion

Hale v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1954No. Civ. 8446PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judg ment of nonsuit. Plaintiffs sued defendant for damages sustained by plaintiff Helen Hale as a result of a fall in defendant’s store. The trial was by the court sitting without a jury. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, defendant moved for a nonsuit. The motion was granted and judgment entered accordingly. Plaintiffs appeal.

On September 1, 1951, Mrs. Hale, hereinafter referred to as appellant, went to the Safeway Store in Gridley to do her weekly shopping.- It was about 4:30 p. m., and she was accompanied by her 10-year-old boy. The layout…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ortega v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Bridgman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Oldenburg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Presnell v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API