Legal Opinion

Henderson v. McGill

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1963No. Civ. No. 20977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in a personal injury action, after jury trial, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $10,000.1

Question Presented.

Does the evidence show as a matter of law that defendants ' premises were not negligently maintained ?

Evidence.

Defendants own and operate a coffee shop on leased premises in Vallejo, known as Twins Coffee Shop. Adjacent to the building in which the coffee shop is operated is a small parking lot maintained by defendants for use of its patrons. About 3 feet out from the building is a bumper rail, leaving an asphalt paved area2 between the bumper rail…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Weddle v. HeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Wilson v. J.P. Allen Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  3. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Barrett v. Leech CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Summer J. v. United States Baseball FederationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API