Henderson v. McGill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in a personal injury action, after jury trial, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $10,000.1
Question Presented.
Does the evidence show as a matter of law that defendants ' premises were not negligently maintained ?
Evidence.
Defendants own and operate a coffee shop on leased premises in Vallejo, known as Twins Coffee Shop. Adjacent to the building in which the coffee shop is operated is a small parking lot maintained by defendants for use of its patrons. About 3 feet out from the building is a bumper rail, leaving an asphalt paved area2 between the bumper rail…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Weddle v. HeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Wilson v. J.P. Allen Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Barrett v. Leech CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Summer J. v. United States Baseball FederationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.