Legal Opinion

Terrell Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1920No. 9643PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breekenridge, Judge. Action by C. B. Davis and others, against ■the Terrell Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

On June 8th, 1915, the above named defendants in error, plaintiffs below, hereinafter called plaintiffs, commenced this action against the above-named plaintiff in error, defendant below, hereinafter called defendant, in the superior court of Tulsa county.

The material portion of the plaintiff’s petition was as follows:

“2nd. The plaintiffs state and allege that on or about the____day of April, 1914, while acting through their agent, and one of their firm, C. W. Connelly, they made and entered into a contract with .the defendant, acting through its agent, M. H. Connor, whereby the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cloe v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of St. Paul v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Dickinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. McCoy v. WosikaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Danciger v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Knupp v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council v. ShoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. Baker & Strawn v. Miller & Jones Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Whitney v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API