Danciger v. Isaacs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action by Moe A. Isaacs against Dan Dan-ciger for conversion. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This is an appeal by Dan Danciger, plaintiff in error, defendant below, who, for convenience, will be referred to as the defendant, from a judgment obtained against him upon a verdict of the jury in favor of Moe A. Isaacs, defendant in error, who, for convenience, will hereafter be referred to as the plaintiff.
The suit was an action for the conversion ■ of an undivided one-third interest in the following property: 420 shares of stock of the Oklahoma Star Oil Company, notes* aggregating $350, and $400 in cash. A demurrer to the petition was overruled; the defendant then answered, to which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lusk v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- In Re Estate of KlufaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Terrell Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Alamo Nat. Bank of San Antonio, Tex. v. Dawson Prod.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- First Nat. Bank of Cushing v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Clark v. Slick Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Young v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Ohio Fuel Co. v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- McKee v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.