Legal Opinion

Farmers Gin Co. v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1930No. 21553PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY,, J.

Carl W. Cooper, while engaged in hazardous employment with the Farmers Gin Company, at Granite, on the 19th day of October, 1929, received an accidental personal injury to his eye, which injury was caused by a cotton “bur” striking him in the eye as he worked as a “gin section man.” Claimant lost only one-half day’s work as a result of that accident, and so the injury was not compensable in that it did not continue over the statutory waiting period. However, after returning to work, the eye continued to bother claimant, and Dr. Nunnery, who had administered treatment to claimant,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Harrison v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kiger v. Idaho CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Fitzgibbons v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Governair Corp. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API