Legal Opinion
McQuillan v. Department of Liquor Control
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 18, 1990No. 14025PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether an error in the form of a required citation requires dismissal of an administrative appeal to the Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiffs, Lynn McQuillan and Mexican Cafe of Westport, Inc., *668sought judicial review of an order of the defendant department of liquor control (department) suspending the named plaintiffs restaurant liquor permit for five days. In the trial court, the department successfully moved for a dismissal of the plaintiffs’ appeal because of their alleged failure to include a citation as required by law.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Sheehan v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.