Legal Opinion
Lyoch v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided September 11, 1995No. 4:94CV1384 JCHPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HAMILTON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery. Defendant opposes this motion. In accordance with Local Rule 7, Plaintiffs counsel certifies that she has unsuccessfiilly attempted to resolve this discovery dispute with Defendant.
*65 BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq., as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et. seq. Plaintiff was employed by Defendant for thirty-three…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arthur Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metal Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Claxton L. Burns, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Thiokol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Horizon Holdings, L.L.C. v. Genmar Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Jackson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- Owens v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Bell v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Miller v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.