Legal Opinion
Arthur Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 30, 1990No. 120, Docket 89-7402PublishedCited by 319 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Chief Judge:
Arthur Hollander appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Warren W. Eginton, Judge, granting Hollander’s former employer, American Cyanamid Company, summary judgment on Hollander’s claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 623 et seq. (1982 & Supp. V 1987), and dismissing his Connecticut state law claim for tortious interference with a business expectancy. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
BACKGROUND
In 1973, Hollander was hired by American Cyanamid as Manager of Management Engineering…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Harriet Ramseur v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by319 opinions
- Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Espinal v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Summa v. Hofstra UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Syed Saifuddin Yusuf v. Vassar CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Pamela Kotcher and Barbara Davis, Pamela Kotcher v. Rosa and Sullivan Appliance Center, Inc., and Herbert TrageserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.