Bell v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN MARIE DONIO, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court are two pretrial motions concerning the scope of discovery in this putative class action suit concerning alleged gender discrimination by Defendant, Lockheed Martin Corporation, and a motion concerning the timing of discovery given that the class has not yet been certified pursuant to Fed. R. Crv. P. 23. Specifically, Plaintiff, Carol Bell, has filed a motion [Doc. No. 47] seeking to compel Defendant to produce company-wide discovery, including information relating to other Business Areas of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Fassett v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Westfield Insurance Co. v. Icon Legacy Custom Modular HomesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- GARDNER v. BOONEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.