Legal Opinion
Weise v. Casper
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2007No. 06-1504, 06-1516PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Michael Casper and Jay Bob Klinkerman (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the district court’s denial, without prejudice, of their Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss based on qualified immunity. As the district court ruled only that the evidentiary record was insufficient to rule on the merits of Defendants’ motions, we grant Plaintiffs-Appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
*1262 Background
Plaintiffs-Appellees Leslie Weise and Alex Young (collectively “Plaintiffs”) brought an action pursuant to Bivens…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Thomas v. DurastantiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Schwartz v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Weise v. CasperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Genesee County Employees' Retirement System v. Thornburg Mortgage Securities TrustDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Big Cats of Serenity Springs, Inc. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.