Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Durastanti

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2010No. 07-3343PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR. Circuit Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, Defendant-Appellant John Durastanti, an agent with the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”), appeals the district court’s decision denying him qualified immunity from Plaintiff-Appellee Ricky Lee Thomas’ claim that Agent Durastanti violated Mr. Thomas’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures when Agent Durastanti shot Mr. Thomas. In an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity, this court’s jurisdiction is limited to consid*659ering only legal questions. With that in…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Brooks v. GaenzleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Gutierrez v. Luna CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Quinn v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Leverington v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API