Legal Opinion
Scobee Combs Funeral Home, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 2, 1989No. 87-8668-CIVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION
PAINE, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action, (DE 23). Plaintiff Sco-bee Combs Funeral Home, Inc. (“Scobee”) filed this action in this United States District Court claiming that Defendants violated various Federal and State securities laws in their handling of Scobee’s account with E.F. Hutton, which defendant Fenton managed. Scobee now seeks to compel arbitration.
No written agreement between Scobee and Defendants binds them to arbitrate this matter. Instead, Scobee relies on the National…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,244 Axelrod & Co. v. Kordich, Victor & NeufeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Elizabeth Beverly, Etc. v. John W. MacY Jr., Elizabeth Beverly, Etc. v. National Flood Insurers AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Interpool Ltd. v. Through Transport Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
- United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wheat, First Securities, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Zinsmeyer Trusts PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.