Legal Opinion
Worrlein v. Maier
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 17, 1929No. 27,329PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action for breach of promise of marriage wherein plaintiff liad a verdict for $10,000. By one notice defendant attempts to appeal from two orders denying as many motions for a new trial.
The first motion for new trial was on the ground of excessive damages, that the verdict was not justified by the evidence and contrary to law, and errors of law occurring at the trial. It was denied by an order of August 25, 1928. Notice of the filing of that order was given immediately and the time for' appeal therefrom expired 30 days thereafter. September 15, 1928, defendant máde a second motion, which was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kimball v. PalmerleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State ex rel. Klemer v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Little v. LeightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Ricker v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Sheffield v. MullinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Stover v. Central Broadcasting CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Public Service Co. of NM v. First Judicial Dist. CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Bennett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.