Legal Opinion

Rosenberger v. Mar-Bern Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1942No. Appeal, 325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kelleb, P. J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The uneontradi'eted testimony in tbe record is to the effect that claimant’s husband, George Rosenberger, was employed by the defendant, Mar-Bern Coal Company, as a miner. He was, at the time of the occurrence hereinafter referred to, fifty-two years old and in apparent good health — a man of “unusual strength”. On December 31, 1937, while he was working in the mine with a fellow employee, Frank O’Neill, with a trip of five cars, one of the cars went off the track. In an effort to put the car back on the track each employee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Wks. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Farran v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Zionek v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Baumeister v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herbst v. Hat Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Malik v. UniontownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Carberry v. Reitz Furniture Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Filipczak v. Erie Forge Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1948
  5. Hoffman v. Nittany Printing & Publishing Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API