Legal Opinion

Zionek v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1932No. Appeal 16PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The burden of the complaint of the appellant employer in this workmen’s compensation case is that the controlling finding of the referee was not sufficiently specific to support an award of compensation for disability caused by a hernia.

Claimant, nineteen years of age, was employed by appellant as an inside brakeman at one of its collieries. During the late afternoon of October 3, 1928, several loaded mine cars were derailed, necessitating the use by claimant of an iron instrument approximately three feet long, one-quarter of an inch thick, ten inches wide and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. United Iron & Metal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Berner v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Johnston v. OrcuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Doggett v. South Atlantic Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Contractors v. Pillsbury, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Somerton v. the Bell Tele. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Pastva v. Forge Coal Min. Co., Ap.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API