Legal Opinion
PepsiCo, Inc. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1984No. 83 Civ. 2317 (RJW)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, PepsiCo, Inc., (“Pepsico”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Wilson Sporting Goods Company, have filed the instant action against defendant, Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corporation, pursuant to section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (1982) (“section 43(a)”). Defendant has moved for an order of this Court dismissing the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Plaintiffs oppose…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Conopco, Inc., D/B/A Van Den Bergh Foods Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Campbell Soup Company, Defendants-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Gordon & Breach Science Publishers S.A. v. American Institute of PhysicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Larry Marshak v. Faye Treadwell Treadwell Drifters, Inc the Drifters, Inc. Bowen Agency Ltd/admiral TalentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Bleeping Computer LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.