Oyakawa v. Gillett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL, J.
Aracely G. Gillett and Richard Gillett are husband and wife. Ray Oyakawa sued Richard (but not Aracely) and won. Prior to entry of judgment, Richard and Aracely moved to Arizona. Judgment was entered and Richard appealed but he did not post a bond to stay execution. While that appeal was pending, Oyakawa attempted to garnish Richard’s Arizona wages. When Aracely and Richard opposed the garnishment on the ground that Arizona law prohibits execution against community property assets unless both spouses are named as judgment debtors, Oyakawa abandoned the Arizona proceedings,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- NEC Electronics Inc. v. HurtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Cutting v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Davis v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Century Surety Co. v. PolissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Misik v. D'ArcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- 11601 Wilshire Associates v. GrebowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Milrot v. Stamper Medical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- 11601 Wilshire Associates v. GrebowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.