Legal Opinion
Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Construction, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1987No. B022184PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBERSON, J. *
Appellant Neal B. West appeals from an order of the trial court granting plaintiff/respondent’s motion to amend a judgment obtained by respondent against a corporate defendant (Belmont Construction, Inc.) to include appellant who was not named in the original complaint nor in the original judgment as a judgment debtor based on an alter ego theory.
Appellant’s principal contention is that he was deprived of his due process rights and that the trial court abused its discretion in that: (1) there was no evidence that appellant controlled the litigation on behalf of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Thomson v. L. C. Roney & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Alley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Levander v. Prober (In re Levander)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- NEC Electronics Inc. v. HurtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Toho-Towa Co. v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.