Legal Opinion
NEC Electronics Inc. v. Hurt
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1989No. H002543PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Respondent NEC Electronics Inc. (NEC) filed a motion to amend its judgment against Ph Components (Ph) to add appellant Porter Hurt (Hurt) as a judgment debtor. The trial court granted the motion and Hurt brings this appeal. We reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
NEC filed suit against Ph in March 1985 to recover amounts due for goods which NEC sold to Ph. Frank Finelli, Ph’s chief financial officer, was served with the NEC complaint. Neither Finelli nor Hurt, the sole shareholder and chief executive officer of Ph, was named as a party or served in his individual capacity.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Thomson v. L. C. Roney & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Tomaselli v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Communist Party of the United States of Amerika v. 522 Valencia, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Leek v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.