Legal Opinion
Alaska Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Feldman
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided August 2, 2005No. A04-0239 CV (RRB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BEISTLINE, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are Plaintiffs Alaska Right to Life Political Action Committee and Michael W. Miller (“Plaintiffs”) with a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 2), which has since been converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 54). Plaintiffs argue Canons 5B(l)(d)(i) and (ii) and 3E(1) of the Alaska Code of Judicial Conduct, as well as the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct’s enforcement policy of these canons, “violate [their] rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Family Trust Foundation of Kentucky, Inc. v. WolnitzekDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alaska Right to Life Political Action Committee v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kansas Judicial Watch v. StoutDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Indiana Right to Life, Inc. v. ShepardDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- Wersal v. SextonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Pennsylvania Family Institute, Inc. v. CelluciDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.