Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Family Institute, Inc. v. Celluci
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 2007No. Civil Action 07-1707PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
Before the court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order (Document No. 2), Defendants’ response thereto, Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Document No. 13), Defendants’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Document No. 14), Defendants’ Witness Narrative Statement (Document No. 15), and the arguments and evidence presented by the parties at the preliminary injunction hearing. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted, and the court will issue…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Democracy Rising PA v. CelluciDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Stilp v. ContinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Pennsylvania Family Institute, Inc. v. CelluciDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Democracy Rising PA v. CelluciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010