Legal Opinion
Alaska Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Feldman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 2007No. 05-35902, 05-36027PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In October 2002, the Alaska Right to Life Political Action Committee (“ARL PAC”) circulated a questionnaire to the twelve Alaska state court judges who were seeking retention votes in the then-upcoming November 2002 election. The questionnaire solicited the judges’ views on a variety of legal and political issues such as abortion and assisted suicide. Only four judges responded. None indicated a view with respect to any of the positions listed in the questionnaire but all provided explanations for their decisions not to participate, including concern that responding would…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aventis Pharma SACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- State v. American Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.