Ray v. American Photo Player Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. G. G. Ringolsky, H. A. I. Wolch, Martin L. Haines and Andreani & Haines for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment against it by which a contract for the sale of an organ with piano attachment was declared rescinded. The plaintiff was also given judgment for money he had paid on account of the stipulated purchase price of the instrument.
[1] At the opening of the trial the defendant’s request for leave to file an amendment to its answer was denied, and this is assigned as error. The defendant had dealt with the plaintiff as Carl Ray. The suit was brought in that name. By the proposed amendment the defendant sought to set up a special defense in the nature of a plea in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Owen v. Pomona Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Graham v. EisznerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- In Re RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Berg Metals Corp. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Useldinger v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.