Legal Opinion

Graham v. Eiszner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1888PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of Winnebago County; the Hon. William Brown, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtC. B. Smith, J.

This is an action in assumpsit to recover the amount of twel ve promissory notes. Ap pellee xvas a cooper in Chicago, and appellant was a distiller in Rockford, Illinois. Appellee had been furnishing whisky barrels, suitable to hold sour mash whisky, to appellant for the years 1883 and 1884, which had proven satisfactory. The barrels furnished for these two years were furnished, it is claimed by appellant, under a written contract containing an express warianty. Appellant desired more barrels to hold the same kind of whisky for 1885-6. The distillery was known in a general way as “ Graham’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Medway Cotton Manufactory v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. Ruff v. JarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hypes v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Wiener v. WhippleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Purinton v. Northern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Roberts v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Ray v. American Photo Player Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Ramming v. CaldwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API