Legal Opinion

Daddona v. Thorpe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 2000PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 Joe and Linda Thorpe (the Thorpes) appeal from the final decree entered by the trial court, which, inter alia, permanently enjoined them from erecting a fence or other obstruction over a common paved driveway. We affirm.

¶2 The factual findings of the court below, as well as the procedural history of the instant litigation, can be summarized as follows: Donald and Eva Daddona (the Daddonas) presently reside at 321 East Emmaus Avenue in Allentown, Lehigh County (the Daddona property). The Thorpes presently reside at 333 East Em-maus Avenue (the Thorpe property). Frederick and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Burns Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. BoehmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Kieffer v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  5. Yuscavage v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Temple University Hospital, Inc. v. Healthcare Management Alternatives, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Murray, H. v. Willistown TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Zurich American Insurance v. O'HanlonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Gurecka, F. v. Carroll, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API