Daddona v. Thorpe
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, J.:
¶ 1 Joe and Linda Thorpe (the Thorpes) appeal from the final decree entered by the trial court, which, inter alia, permanently enjoined them from erecting a fence or other obstruction over a common paved driveway. We affirm.
¶2 The factual findings of the court below, as well as the procedural history of the instant litigation, can be summarized as follows: Donald and Eva Daddona (the Daddonas) presently reside at 321 East Emmaus Avenue in Allentown, Lehigh County (the Daddona property). The Thorpes presently reside at 333 East Em-maus Avenue (the Thorpe property). Frederick and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burns Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. BoehmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Kieffer v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Yuscavage v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Temple University Hospital, Inc. v. Healthcare Management Alternatives, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Murray, H. v. Willistown TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Zurich American Insurance v. O'HanlonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Gurecka, F. v. Carroll, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.