Legal Opinion

Yuscavage v. Hamlin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1958No. Appeal, 388PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On this appeal we are called upon to construe a deed in order to determine whether it conveys title to the subsurface gas and oil estates.

In this action to quiet title the facts are undisputed. On April 14, 1919, Pulaski Hamlin and his wife owned and possessed two tracts of land — 64 acres and 20 acres, respectively — located in Exeter Township, Luzerne County, Pa. Nineteen years previously, when Hamlin purchased these two tracts of land, an exception or reservation had been made in the conveyance of “All the coal in and under said two tracts of land, with the right to mine…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Hendler v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Silver v. BushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Ontelaunee Orchards, Inc. v. RothermelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Pennsylvania Horticultural Society v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Faith United Methodist Church & Cemetery of Terra Alta v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Highland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. In MATTER OF CONVEYANCE OF LAND BELONGING TO CITY OF DuBOISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API