Legal Opinion

Gurecka, F. v. Carroll, R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 2017No. 1301 WDA 2014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, P.J.E.:

Robert W. Carroll and Holly Lacey Carroll (Appellants or the Carrolls) appeal from the July 11, 2014 order that entered a permanent injunction enjoining them from interfering with the repair and use of a sewer line located on their property that services the nearby residence owned by Francesca V. Gurecka (Appellee or Ms. Gurecka). We affirm.

The trial court set forth the factual background of the case as follows:

On October 31, 2011, [Appellee], Francesca Gurecka, entered into a written Standard Agreement for the sale of real estate with Rachel French and William…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Burns Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. BoehmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Kieffer v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  5. Tosh v. WittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Guiser, S. v. Sieber, M. & S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Guiser, S. v. Sieber, M. & S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Bartkowski, T. v. Ramondo, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Gurecka, F. v. Carroll, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Gurecka, F. v. Carroll, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API