Johnson v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
Plaintiff Billy Johnson sought to recover damages resulting from the involuntary termination of his employment. From an entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Morton Thiokol, Inc. (“Thiokol”), Johnson appeals. When reviewing an order granting summary judgment, the facts and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the facts are viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.1
Johnson was hired by Thiokol on February 12, 1979, as a process inspector and was continuously employed at Thiokol until the date of his termination, July 20, 1988.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Roland T. Ingels v. Thiokol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Jones v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Bird v. West Valley CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- James v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.