Legal Opinion

Moyle v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1947No. 6328PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Justice.

This case came to the writer on reassignment.

Plaintiffs recovered a judgment against defendant for the use of water owned by plaintiffs, but taken and withheld from them by defendant. From this judgment defendant appeals, assigning 25 asserted errors as grounds for reversal. The assignments however present only two questions for consideration of this court.

1. Does plaintiffs’ complaint state a cause of action?

2. If plaintiffs are entitled to recover what is the proper measure of damage?

A proper consideration of these questions impels an understanding of the background…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Thayer v. Life Assn. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Simpson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Hildale v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Williams v. STATE HIGHWAY COM. OF NORTH CAROLINASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. North Salt Lake v. ST. JOSEPH WATER AND IRR. CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. SALT LAKE COUNTYUtah Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API