Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1993No. 900420PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Plaintiffs were exposed to asbestos while performing renovation work for Mountain Fuel. They appeal from an order of summary judgment on their claims for personal injury, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and the costs of medical monitoring granted on the ground that plaintiffs have not suffered bodily injury. We reverse the order regarding the claims for medical monitoring but affirm the rulings on personal injury and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
In reviewing a summary judgment, we consider the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.