Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Valentin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 21, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4), the Office of Attorney Ethics filed a Motion for Reciprocal Discipline with the Disciplinary Review Board seeking the disbarment of respondent Frank Valentin. The application was based on respondent’s disbarment by New York, which action followed his criminal conviction for the sale of more than one pound of cocaine..In a report that is appended to this opinion, the Disciplinary Review Board recommended that respondent be disbarred. The Court adopts the Board’s report and directs that respondent be disbarred.

So Ordered.

ATTACHMENT

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Discip…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re RosenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. In Re BrickerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Matter of GoldbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Matter of KinnearSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Matter of McCannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re WitherspoonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. In re MustoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MeenenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MeenenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re WitherspoonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API