Legal Opinion

Matter of Kinnear

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 20, 1987PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) commenced this disciplinary proceeding by filing with the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) a Motion for Final Discipline of respondent, Richard T. Kinnear, pursuant to Rule 1:20-6(b)(2)(i). The Motion was based on respondent’s guilty plea to a charge of distribution of a controlled dangerous substance, cocaine, in violation of N.J. S.A. 24:21-19a(1).

The DRB accurately sets forth the relevant facts surrounding respondent’s conviction in its Decision and Recommendation:

Respondent, an admitted addict, “shared or gave” cocaine to an undercover narcotics…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. In Re RosenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. STATE EX REL. v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Matter of ChristieSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. In Re of LockTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Matter of PlevaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API