Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Meenen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2000No. 1999-1399Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 268.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MEENEN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Meenen,

2000-Ohio-333.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Permanent disbarment—Reciprocal discipline. (No. 99-1399—Submitted December 15, 1999—Decided March 22, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED ORDER of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, No. D-22-98. __________________ {¶ 1} This case is pending before the court in accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F). {¶ 2} On November 4, 1998, respondent, Robert D. Meenen, last known…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of ValentinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HineOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MeenenOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API