Legal Opinion

In Re Witherspoon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 29, 2010No. D-157 September Term 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

3 A.3d 496 (2010)

203 N.J. 343

In the Matter of David J. WITHERSPOON, an Attorney at Law.

D-157 September Term 2008

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 1, 2009.

Decided July 29, 2010.

John McGill, III, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Bernard K. Freamon, Newark, argued the cause for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · HoensJustice Hoens

This matter, which comes before the Court on a stipulated factual record, raises questions concerning the appropriate level of discipline to be imposed on a member of the bar who has used his license to practice law as a means to seek sexual favors…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited43 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Matter of GoldbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Matter of LitwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API