Legal Opinion
Lolling v. Midwest Patrol
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 1995No. C4-95-300PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Relator Kenneth M. Lolling appeals from the determination of the Commissioner’s representative that Lolling was disqualified from reemployment insurance benefits. Lolling argues that under Minn.Stat. § 268.10, subd. 1(d) (1992), respondent Midwest Patrol failed to file its claim of disqualification in a timely manner, and therefore the Department of Economic Security (department) did not have jurisdiction over the issue.
FACTS
Lolling worked for respondent Midwest Patrol from March 1, 1993, to April 6, 1994. He was a full-time investigator at the rate of $11 per hour for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Salmen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- King v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Valenty v. Medical Concepts Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Jaakola v. Duluth/Superior Area Educational Television Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996