Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 3, 2014No. C 09-04057 RSPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
RICHARD SEEBORG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I.INTRODUCTION
In September 2009, plaintiff Armando Rodriguez, an individual who requires a wheelchair for mobility, filed this action against defendants Barrita Inc., Nicandro Barrita, ENS Associates Investments LLC, and Masoud Shahidi. In his First Amended Complaint (FAC), Rodriguez alleges that defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), the California Disabled Persons Act, and the Unruh Act. In particular, he claims defendants discriminated against him by failing to remove…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AECOM Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Rosa v. Lewis Foods of 42nd Street, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- D'Lil v. Riverboat Delta King, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Dial, Inc., a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation v. City OfNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- Bailey v. Board of Commissioners of the Louisiana Stadium and Exposition DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.