Legal Opinion
Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 2010No. Nos. 08-55867, 08-55946, 09-55327, 09-55425PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed July 26, 2010 [614 F.3d 971] is amended as follows. On page 10643 [614 F.3d at 980] of the slip opinion, after the sentence, “We must therefore be ‘particularly cautious’ regarding ‘credibility determinations that rely on a plaintiffs past [Disabilities Act] litigation.’ Id,” insert the following text:
Such caution is especially appropriate in this case where, as previously noted, Chipotle stipulated that “Antoninetti wants to be able to have the ‘Chipotle experience.’ ” Accordingly, there can be no doubt that Antoninetti wanted to return to the Chipotle restaurants to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- D'LIL v. Best Western Encina Lodge & SuitesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Doug Wander v. Jack S. Kaus Irene B. KausCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Paralyzed Veterans of America, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. D.C. Arena L.P., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Vogel v. Rite Aid Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Martin Vogel v. Harbor Plaza Center, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Moeller v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.